EPA Finds Greenhouse Gases Pose Threat to Public Health, Welfare
(Washington, D.C. – April 17, 2009) After a thorough scientific review ordered in 2007 by the U.S. Supreme Court, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a proposed finding Friday that greenhouse gases contribute to air pollution that may endanger public health or welfare.
Contact: Cathy Milbourn, 202-564-4355 / 7849 / milbourn.cathy@epa.gov
(Washington, D.C. – April 17, 2009) After a thorough scientific
review ordered in 2007 by the U.S. Supreme Court, the Environmental
Protection Agency issued a proposed finding Friday that greenhouse
gases contribute to air pollution that may endanger public health or
welfare.
The proposed finding, which now moves to a public comment period, identified six greenhouse gases that pose a potential threat.
“This finding confirms that greenhouse gas pollution is a serious
problem now and for future generations. Fortunately, it follows
President Obama’s call for a low carbon economy and strong leadership
in Congress on clean energy and climate legislation,” said
Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “This pollution problem has a solution –
one that will create millions of green jobs and end our country’s
dependence on foreign oil.”
As the proposed endangerment finding states, “In both magnitude
and probability, climate change is an enormous problem. The greenhouse
gases that are responsible for it endanger public health and welfare
within the meaning of the Clean Air Act.”
EPA’s proposed endangerment finding is based on rigorous,
peer-reviewed scientific analysis of six gases – carbon dioxide,
methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur
hexafluoride – that have been the subject of intensive analysis by
scientists around the world. The science clearly shows that
concentrations of these gases are at unprecedented levels as a result
of human emissions, and these high levels are very likely the cause of
the increase in average temperatures and other changes in our climate.
The scientific analysis also confirms that climate change impacts
human health in several ways. Findings from a recent EPA study titled “Assessment
of the Impacts of Global Change on Regional U.S. Air Quality: A
Synthesis of Climate Change Impacts on Ground-Level Ozone,” for
example, suggest that climate change may lead to higher concentrations
of ground-level ozone, a harmful pollutant. Additional impacts of
climate change include, but are not limited to:
· increased drought;
· more heavy downpours and flooding;
· more frequent and intense heat waves and wildfires;
· greater sea level rise;
· more intense storms; and
· harm to water resources, agriculture, wildlife and ecosystems.
In proposing the finding, Administrator Jackson also took into
account the disproportionate impact climate change has on the health of
certain segments of the population, such as the poor, the very young,
the elderly, those already in poor health, the disabled, those living
alone and/or indigenous populations dependent on one or a few resources.
In addition to threatening human health, the analysis finds that
climate change also has serious national security implications.
Consistent with this proposed finding, in 2007, 11 retired U.S.
generals and admirals signed a report from the Center for a New
American Security stating that climate change “presents significant
national security challenges for the United States.” Escalating
violence in destabilized regions can be incited and fomented by an
increasing scarcity of resources – including water. This lack of
resources, driven by climate change patterns, then drives massive
migration to more stabilized regions of the world.
The proposed endangerment finding now enters the public comment
period, which is the next step in the deliberative process EPA must
undertake before issuing final findings. Today’s proposed finding does
not include any proposed regulations. Before taking any steps to reduce
greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, EPA would conduct an
appropriate process and consider stakeholder input. Notwithstanding
this required regulatory process, both President Obama and
Administrator Jackson have repeatedly indicated their preference for
comprehensive legislation to address this issue and create the
framework for a clean energy economy.
More information: http://epa.gov/climatechange/endangerment.html